OpenSourceArk/Ghost
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
497491fbef
Ghost/ghost/core/.c8rc.json

35 lines
863 B
JSON
Raw Normal View History

Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
{
Mode c8 configuration from package.json to .c8rc.json refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Simplifies the commands in package.json by adding defaults to the .c8rc.json file
2021-11-16 13:22:15 +03:00
"all": true,
Pinned coverage to current levels to prevent drops - Updating our config to have `--check-coverage` enforces that the coverage meets a certain level. - The default is 95 I believe, but our coverage is lower. - I've set the levels to our current levels, so any drop below these numbers will cause the build to fail. - I've also set the reporters to be text, html and cobertura so we always have a mini report, the full HTML files to navigate and cobertura for CI - Cleaned up CI so we don't use the cov:unit command as we're now using codecov - This also means we can remove the cov:unit command which was weird to use because it uses the last test run, which can be confusing
2022-02-24 12:20:17 +03:00
"check-coverage": true,
"reporter": [
Changed c8 reporter html -> html-spa - I might be the only person who uses these, but I like to dig into coverage reports so I can see where we've got holes - In Ghost the reports is huge and unweildy, and it's hard to see what coverage is like for components grouped by folders - html-spa reporter fixes this, it makes a beautiful nested tree view, but you can also switch to flat - it's so much more useful for working on coverage in an area of the codebase!
2022-03-09 17:15:40 +03:00
"html-spa",
Pinned coverage to current levels to prevent drops - Updating our config to have `--check-coverage` enforces that the coverage meets a certain level. - The default is 95 I believe, but our coverage is lower. - I've set the levels to our current levels, so any drop below these numbers will cause the build to fail. - I've also set the reporters to be text, html and cobertura so we always have a mini report, the full HTML files to navigate and cobertura for CI - Cleaned up CI so we don't use the cov:unit command as we're now using codecov - This also means we can remove the cov:unit command which was weird to use because it uses the last test run, which can be confusing
2022-02-24 12:20:17 +03:00
"text-summary",
"cobertura"
],
Removed db schema config from test coverage refs https://ghost.slack.com/archives/C02G9E68C/p1669707419081529?thread_ts=1669702577.532999&cid=C02G9E68C refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 - Database schema definition file is a special type of "configuration" file containing mostly static declarations. This sort of code should not be tested by unit tests, rather by e2e tests
2022-11-29 10:50:28 +03:00
"statements": 60,
Introduced separate config for e2e tests refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/475 - Having a single coverage config file for unit and e2e type of tests doesn't play well for tracking coverage progress. The unit test ones are run often when developing, so one can observe the changes in coverage. The e2e tests are ran mostly on CI environment and have different purposes/reach comparing to unit tests.
2022-11-16 12:21:33 +03:00
"branches": 85,
Lowered minimum function coverage tests (#15894) refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/15877 refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Ghost/pull/15892 We've been running into issues with unit test coverage in the references PR's and have tried adding unit tests, but the problem persists. We're lowering this to unblock development.
2022-11-29 12:55:53 +03:00
"functions": 50,
Removed db schema config from test coverage refs https://ghost.slack.com/archives/C02G9E68C/p1669707419081529?thread_ts=1669702577.532999&cid=C02G9E68C refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 - Database schema definition file is a special type of "configuration" file containing mostly static declarations. This sort of code should not be tested by unit tests, rather by e2e tests
2022-11-29 10:50:28 +03:00
"lines": 60,
Mode c8 configuration from package.json to .c8rc.json refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Simplifies the commands in package.json by adding defaults to the .c8rc.json file
2021-11-16 13:22:15 +03:00
"include": [
"core/{*.js,frontend,server,shared}"
],
Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
"exclude": [
"core/frontend/src/**",
"core/frontend/public/**",
"core/server/data/migrations/**",
Removed db schema config from test coverage refs https://ghost.slack.com/archives/C02G9E68C/p1669707419081529?thread_ts=1669702577.532999&cid=C02G9E68C refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 - Database schema definition file is a special type of "configuration" file containing mostly static declarations. This sort of code should not be tested by unit tests, rather by e2e tests
2022-11-29 10:50:28 +03:00
"core/server/data/schema/schema.js",
Added more files to c8 excludes There are some files we don't expect _unit_ tests for - they are e2e tested and tracking that is a different problem! - express routes and wiring files - this does not count middleware. Middleware functions should be fully unit tested - previous API version files - canary api endpoint configuration files - this does not count api utils, valiation and serialisation which can be unit tested
2021-11-16 18:53:08 +03:00
"!core/server/data/migrations/utils.js",
"core/frontend/web/**",
"!core/frontend/web/middleware/**",
"core/server/web/api/**",
"!core/server/web/api/middleware/**",
Added "testmode" app to coverage ignore list refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/486 - Testmode is a special app used for manual testing and has no value in code coverage reports
2022-11-30 12:45:22 +03:00
"core/server/web/api/testmode/**",
Added more files to c8 excludes There are some files we don't expect _unit_ tests for - they are e2e tested and tracking that is a different problem! - express routes and wiring files - this does not count middleware. Middleware functions should be fully unit tested - previous API version files - canary api endpoint configuration files - this does not count api utils, valiation and serialisation which can be unit tested
2021-11-16 18:53:08 +03:00
"core/server/web/parent/**",
"!core/server/web/parent/middleware/**",
"core/server/web/shared/**",
"!core/server/web/shared/middleware/**",
Renamed API `canary/` folder to `endpoints/` - now we only have one API version, it doesn't make sense to keep "canary" around - renaming it to `endpoints/` makes more sense for this - this commit renames the `core/server/api/canary/` folder to `core/server/api/endpoints/` - it also fixes the naming in test titles and the various other places we relied on this
2022-07-04 11:27:55 +03:00
"core/server/api/endpoints/**",
"!core/server/api/endpoints/utils"
Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
]
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink