OpenSourceArk/Ghost
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
34047737b8
Ghost/.c8rc.json

33 lines
783 B
JSON
Raw Normal View History

Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
{
Mode c8 configuration from package.json to .c8rc.json refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Simplifies the commands in package.json by adding defaults to the .c8rc.json file
2021-11-16 13:22:15 +03:00
"all": true,
Pinned coverage to current levels to prevent drops - Updating our config to have `--check-coverage` enforces that the coverage meets a certain level. - The default is 95 I believe, but our coverage is lower. - I've set the levels to our current levels, so any drop below these numbers will cause the build to fail. - I've also set the reporters to be text, html and cobertura so we always have a mini report, the full HTML files to navigate and cobertura for CI - Cleaned up CI so we don't use the cov:unit command as we're now using codecov - This also means we can remove the cov:unit command which was weird to use because it uses the last test run, which can be confusing
2022-02-24 12:20:17 +03:00
"check-coverage": true,
"reporter": [
Changed c8 reporter html -> html-spa - I might be the only person who uses these, but I like to dig into coverage reports so I can see where we've got holes - In Ghost the reports is huge and unweildy, and it's hard to see what coverage is like for components grouped by folders - html-spa reporter fixes this, it makes a beautiful nested tree view, but you can also switch to flat - it's so much more useful for working on coverage in an area of the codebase!
2022-03-09 17:15:40 +03:00
"html-spa",
Pinned coverage to current levels to prevent drops - Updating our config to have `--check-coverage` enforces that the coverage meets a certain level. - The default is 95 I believe, but our coverage is lower. - I've set the levels to our current levels, so any drop below these numbers will cause the build to fail. - I've also set the reporters to be text, html and cobertura so we always have a mini report, the full HTML files to navigate and cobertura for CI - Cleaned up CI so we don't use the cov:unit command as we're now using codecov - This also means we can remove the cov:unit command which was weird to use because it uses the last test run, which can be confusing
2022-02-24 12:20:17 +03:00
"text-summary",
"cobertura"
],
Updated minimum coverage percentages - Over the last month we've managed to increase coverage by a few % - Update the minimum values so we don't accidentally reduce it again
2022-03-29 17:37:17 +03:00
"statements": 57,
Remapped `member.subscribed` value using newsletter subscriptions (#14563) refs https://github.com/TryGhost/Team/issues/1545 - Remapped `member.subscribed` value based on newsletter subscriptions in API output - Enabled filtering by subscribed status for multiple newsletters Co-authored-by: Matt Hanley <git@matthanley.co.uk>
2022-04-25 22:11:27 +03:00
"branches": 85,
Updated minimum coverage percentages - Over the last month we've managed to increase coverage by a few % - Update the minimum values so we don't accidentally reduce it again
2022-03-29 17:37:17 +03:00
"functions": 53,
"lines": 57,
Mode c8 configuration from package.json to .c8rc.json refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Simplifies the commands in package.json by adding defaults to the .c8rc.json file
2021-11-16 13:22:15 +03:00
"include": [
"core/{*.js,frontend,server,shared}"
],
Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
"exclude": [
"core/frontend/src/**",
"core/frontend/public/**",
"core/server/data/migrations/**",
Added more files to c8 excludes There are some files we don't expect _unit_ tests for - they are e2e tested and tracking that is a different problem! - express routes and wiring files - this does not count middleware. Middleware functions should be fully unit tested - previous API version files - canary api endpoint configuration files - this does not count api utils, valiation and serialisation which can be unit tested
2021-11-16 18:53:08 +03:00
"!core/server/data/migrations/utils.js",
"core/frontend/web/**",
"!core/frontend/web/middleware/**",
"core/server/web/api/**",
"!core/server/web/api/middleware/**",
"core/server/web/parent/**",
"!core/server/web/parent/middleware/**",
"core/server/web/shared/**",
"!core/server/web/shared/middleware/**",
Renamed API `canary/` folder to `endpoints/` - now we only have one API version, it doesn't make sense to keep "canary" around - renaming it to `endpoints/` makes more sense for this - this commit renames the `core/server/api/canary/` folder to `core/server/api/endpoints/` - it also fixes the naming in test titles and the various other places we relied on this
2022-07-04 11:27:55 +03:00
"core/server/api/endpoints/**",
"!core/server/api/endpoints/utils"
Configured c8 to exclude frontend and migrations from coverage refs: https://github.com/TryGhost/Toolbox/issues/117 Adding a basic configuration to the unit test coverage tracking to ignore irrelevant files.
2021-11-16 12:53:32 +03:00
]
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink